ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
82.108.212.8

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-13 01:38:00
First seen: 2026-08-12 19:56:32
Last seen: 2026-08-23 02:01:42
228

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 228/100. Total malicious requests observed: 831.

BURSTDANGER_PATHMETHODRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERERUA_CHANGEDUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
82.108.212.8
Type
Residential
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
City of London
ISP
GTT Communications Inc.
Organization
GTT - EMEA Ltd
Autonomous System
AS3257 GTT Communications Inc.
Hit Count
831
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 5/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 6/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 7/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 9/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Danger medium hits: 3Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+30
Danger medium hits: 5Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+50
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 7High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
POST seenBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+8
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 673
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-12 19:56:32
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 5/2s (+35)
2026-08-23 02:01:42
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 228/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

GTT Communications Inc.
AS3257 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 82.108.212.8 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 82.108.212.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 82.108.212.8: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 82.108.212.8.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 82.108.212.8 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 82.108.212.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

82.108.212.8 has been assigned a threat score of 228/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 82.108.212.8 has been traced to City of London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of GTT Communications Inc.. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 10 days in our monitoring system, producing 831 flagged requests at a rate of ~83.1/day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. The combination of 3 distinct attack vectors indicates a sophisticated, multi-pronged threat actor deploying automated tools that probe multiple attack surfaces simultaneously. United Kingdom currently accounts for 105 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 228/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

45.86.203.126 (350)104.28.240.60 (340)104.28.192.67 (340)104.28.208.60 (340)194.32.120.30 (320)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS3257

82.108.212.5 (248)82.108.212.16 (240)82.108.212.10 (230)216.36.105.63 (180)82.108.212.250 (165)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: