ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
79.127.129.201

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 12:03:31
First seen: 2026-03-09 04:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-20 16:00:05
180

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 180/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404BURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
79.127.129.201
Type
Residential
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Tokyo
ISP
Datacamp Limited
Organization
Cdnext TYO
Autonomous System
AS212238 Datacamp Limited
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger medium hits: 19Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst: 9 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 20 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger medium hits: 36Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Σ = 290
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-09 04:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), Danger medium hits: 19 (+60), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25)
2026-03-20 16:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 180/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Datacamp Limited
AS212238 · 🇯🇵 Japan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 79.127.129.201 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 79.127.129.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 79.127.129.201: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 79.127.129.201.

07

Neighbors in 79.127.129.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

79.127.129.201 has been assigned a threat score of 180/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 79.127.129.201 originates from Tokyo, Japan, operating on the network of Datacamp Limited. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. The address has been active for 11 days in our monitoring system, producing 2 flagged requests at a rate of ~0.2/day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 107 flagged addresses, Japan represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 180/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

103.163.220.216 (340)35.243.110.60 (288)20.89.56.154 (280)20.27.221.169 (280)20.210.188.132 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS212238

212.30.33.72 (305)45.91.23.64 (305)98.159.233.109 (305)84.233.212.3 (295)45.95.243.145 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

💡 Zero Trust Architecture Principles

Zero trust eliminates implicit trust based on network location. Every access request is verified regardless of source, minimizing the impact of compromised credentials or network breaches. Implementation requires strong identity verification and continuous authorization.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: