ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
72.60.93.178

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-19 04:06:51
First seen: 2026-06-28 16:29:31
Last seen: 2026-07-05 03:51:25
195

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 195/100. Total malicious requests observed: 531.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
72.60.93.178
Type
Hosting
Country
🇫🇷 France
City
Paris
ISP
Hostinger International Limited
Organization
Hostinger
Autonomous System
AS47583 Hostinger International Limited
Hit Count
531
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst 24/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 24/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 24High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 195
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-06-28 16:29:31
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst 24/10s (+35), Burst 24/2s (+35)
2026-07-05 03:51:25
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 195/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Hostinger International Limited
AS47583 · 🇫🇷 France
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 72.60.93.178 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 72.60.93.178: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 72.60.93.178.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

72.60.93.178 has been assigned a threat score of 195/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

72.60.93.178 is registered in Paris, France, operating on the network of Hostinger International Limited. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 531 malicious requests from this address across a 6-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~88.5 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Path Enumeration and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. At 195/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇫🇷 Top threats from France

View all →

🏢 Same network: AS47583

72.61.134.130 (215)157.173.208.242 (195)195.35.39.148 (195)153.92.222.108 (75)72.60.197.250 (75)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Rate Limiting and Throttling Strategies

Effective rate limiting must balance protection against abuse with allowing legitimate traffic bursts. Sliding window algorithms, token buckets, and adaptive thresholds based on client reputation provide layered defense against flooding attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: