ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
72.60.39.202

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:07:01
First seen: 2026-03-02 20:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-03 15:00:05
75

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 75/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
72.60.39.202
Type
Hosting
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Frankfurt am Main
ISP
Hostinger DE
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS47583 Hostinger International Limited
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 100
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-02 20:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-03-03 15:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 75/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Hostinger DE
AS47583 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 72.60.39.202 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 72.60.39.202 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

72.60.39.202 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 72.60.39.202 originates from Frankfurt am Main, Germany, operating on the network of Hostinger DE. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 3 malicious requests, averaging approximately 3 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. The score of 75/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

82.25.102.234 (215)148.230.104.83 (75)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS47583

77.37.92.171 (240)45.132.241.244 (230)187.127.111.135 (220)82.25.102.234 (215)178.16.128.177 (195)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

💡 WebSocket Security Considerations

WebSocket connections bypass traditional HTTP security controls, creating opportunities for cross-site WebSocket hijacking, denial of service, and data injection. Proper origin validation, authentication, and message rate limiting are essential for secure WebSocket implementations.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: