ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
69.162.118.45

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 01:01:28
First seen: 2026-07-23 01:13:58
Last seen: 2026-07-26 03:59:42
130

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 130/100. Total malicious requests observed: 181.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
69.162.118.45
Type
Hosting
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
ISP
Limestone Networks, Inc.
Organization
Limestone Networks
Autonomous System
AS46475 Limestone Networks, Inc.
Hit Count
181
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst 6/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 5Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+50
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Σ = 130
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-23 01:13:58
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst 6/2s (+35), Danger medium hits: 5 (+50)
2026-07-26 03:59:42
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 130/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Limestone Networks, Inc.
AS46475 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 69.162.118.45 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 69.162.118.45 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 69.162.118.45.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

69.162.118.45 has been assigned a threat score of 130/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 69.162.118.45 to malicious activity originating from Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of Limestone Networks, Inc.. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. During its 3-day observation window, we recorded 181 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 60.3 per day on average. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (Path Enumeration and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. A score of 130/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

View all →

🏢 Same network: AS46475

64.31.55.45 (170)77.83.26.213 (130)212.18.127.215 (130)46.253.131.210 (95)185.212.115.240 (95)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 GDPR and Threat Intelligence

Processing IP addresses for security purposes under GDPR requires balancing legitimate interest in network protection with data minimization principles. Threat intelligence platforms must implement appropriate retention policies and provide mechanisms for data subject rights.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: