ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
68.221.203.118

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:13:44
First seen: 2026-04-22 15:00:07
Last seen: 2026-04-22 20:00:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
68.221.203.118
Type
Hosting
Country
🇪🇸 Spain
City
Madrid
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (spaincentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 38High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 323Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 37 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 122 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 321Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 103 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 45 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 165 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 445
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-22 15:00:07
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 38 (+100), Danger medium hits: 323 (+60)
2026-04-22 20:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇪🇸 Spain
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 68.221.203.118 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 68.221.203.118: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 68.221.203.118 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 68.221.203.118.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

68.221.203.118 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 68.221.203.118 originates from Madrid, Spain, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 3 malicious requests, averaging approximately 3 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. Spain currently accounts for 114 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇪🇸 Top threats from Spain

158.173.36.160 (305)212.30.33.72 (305)45.67.99.32 (305)158.158.33.103 (280)158.158.105.51 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

158.158.33.103 (280)158.158.105.51 (280)68.221.64.54 (280)158.158.51.6 (280)68.221.129.30 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 Patch Management Urgency

The window between vulnerability disclosure and exploitation continues to shrink. Critical CVEs are now exploited within hours of publication. Automated patch management, virtual patching through WAFs, and rapid deployment pipelines are essential for timely remediation.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: