ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
68.221.134.82

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:13:44
First seen: 2026-04-17 23:00:05
Last seen: 2026-04-18 23:00:07
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 23.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHBURSTRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBE
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
68.221.134.82
Type
Hosting
Country
🇪🇸 Spain
City
Madrid
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (spaincentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
23
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 12High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 90Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 47 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 118 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 60Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 46 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 90 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 48 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 60 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Danger medium hits: 24Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 36 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 36 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 49 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 120 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Burst: 24 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 24 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 8High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 26Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 26 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 26 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 39 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 39 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 22Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 33 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 33 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 21 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 22 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 22 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 100Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 153 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 16High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 33Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 37 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 44 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 1935
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-17 23:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 12 (+100), Danger medium hits: 90 (+60)
2026-04-18 23:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇪🇸 Spain
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 68.221.134.82 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 68.221.134.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 68.221.134.82 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 68.221.134.82.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 68.221.134.82: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 68.221.134.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

68.221.134.82 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest FloodingPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 68.221.134.82 has been traced to Madrid, Spain, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. Our sensors captured 23 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~23 requests per day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. Spain currently accounts for 114 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇪🇸 Top threats from Spain

158.173.36.160 (305)212.30.33.72 (305)45.67.99.32 (305)158.158.33.103 (280)158.158.105.51 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

158.158.33.103 (280)158.158.105.51 (280)68.221.64.54 (280)158.158.51.6 (280)68.221.129.30 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Autonomous System Analysis

Analyzing attack patterns at the AS (Autonomous System) level reveals which networks harbor the most malicious activity. Some ASes have abuse rates orders of magnitude higher than average, indicating lax enforcement of acceptable use policies.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: