ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
68.119.232.102

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 06:38:32
First seen: 2026-03-13 07:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-13 07:00:06
85

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 85/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDRATIO_404BURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
68.119.232.102
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Walnut
ISP
Charter Communications
Organization
Spectrum
Autonomous System
AS20115 Charter Communications LLC
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst: 6 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 85
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-13 07:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst: 6 req / 2s (+35)
2026-03-13 07:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 85/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Charter Communications
AS20115 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 68.119.232.102 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 68.119.232.102 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 68.119.232.102: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 68.119.232.102 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

68.119.232.102 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 68.119.232.102, located in Walnut, United States, operating on the network of Charter Communications, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. United States currently accounts for 113 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 85/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS20115

96.41.38.202 (195)35.148.167.39 (135)71.84.136.178 (130)68.118.222.25 (120)68.186.187.182 (103)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 SSH Brute Force Defense

SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: