
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA suspicious (short/empty) | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +15 | |
| Danger strong hits: 2 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +50 | |
| Danger medium hits: 2 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +20 |
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Address UA spoofing from 64.227.70.62: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.
Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 123 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 123 |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2025-55753 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-49630 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-25690 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-23048 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-29404 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-27522 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-49812 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-26377 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-0941 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-31122 | NVD → |
| CVE-2006-20001 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-42516 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38472 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-2299 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-43204 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-38474 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-27316 | NVD → |
| CVE-2011-2688 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-28615 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-22720 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-65082 | NVD → |
| CVE-2012-4360 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-40898 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-28330 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-45802 | NVD → |
🔴 This host has 54 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
64.227.70.62 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.
The following attack categories were identified:
64.227.70.62 is registered in Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of DigitalOcean, LLC. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The IP exhibits User-Agent manipulation, switching between different browser identities or sending empty headers. With 103 flagged addresses, Netherlands represents a significant presence in our threat database. A threat score of 85/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.
Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.