ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
64.188.5.84

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 08:51:09
First seen: 2026-03-17 23:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-17 23:00:06
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
64.188.5.84
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Los Angeles
ISP
HostPapa
Organization
David Wu
Autonomous System
AS36352 HostPapa
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-17 23:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-03-17 23:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

HostPapa
AS36352 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 64.188.5.84 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 64.188.5.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 64.188.5.84 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

07

Neighbors in 64.188.5.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (6)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
1344UnknownLowService on port 1344
3128UnknownLowService on port 3128
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (56)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2025-54574NVD →
CVE-2023-46724NVD →
CVE-2019-12519NVD →
CVE-2019-12524NVD →
CVE-2019-12525NVD →
CVE-2025-62168NVD →
CVE-2021-31807NVD →
CVE-2023-49286NVD →
CVE-2020-11945NVD →
CVE-2019-12529NVD →
CVE-2020-15810NVD →
CVE-2019-18678NVD →
CVE-2020-8450NVD →
CVE-2020-15049NVD →
CVE-2020-14058NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2019-13345NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2021-33620NVD →
CVE-2019-12526NVD →
CVE-2024-25617NVD →
CVE-2021-28116NVD →
CVE-2016-10003NVD →
CVE-2019-12521NVD →
+31 more

🔴 This host has 56 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.5.20

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

64.188.5.84 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

64.188.5.84 is registered in Los Angeles, United States, operating on the network of HostPapa. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This is a residential IP address, suggesting a compromised home device such as a router, smart appliance, or infected workstation participating in a botnet. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. United States currently accounts for 201 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 105/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS36352

23.94.40.119 (318)172.245.95.40 (280)23.94.28.183 (255)192.227.215.35 (255)172.245.214.62 (245)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors

WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.

💡 False Positive Management

False positives erode trust in security systems and waste analyst resources. Effective management requires feedback loops, allowlisting mechanisms, contextual analysis, and regular tuning of detection rules based on operational experience.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: