ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
62.109.22.113

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 06:21:45
First seen: 2026-04-26 00:00:09
Last seen: 2026-04-26 00:00:09
195

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 195/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404BURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
62.109.22.113
Type
Hosting
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
Khimki
ISP
JSC IOT
Organization
JSC Datacenter
Autonomous System
AS29182 JSC IOT
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger medium hits: 117Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst: 18 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 58 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 195
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-26 00:00:09
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Danger medium hits: 117 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-04-26 00:00:09
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 195/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

JSC IOT
AS29182 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 62.109.22.113 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 62.109.22.113: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 62.109.22.113.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

62.109.22.113 has been assigned a threat score of 195/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 62.109.22.113, located in Khimki, Russia, operating on the network of JSC IOT, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 111 flagged addresses, Russia represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 195/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)72.56.191.6 (265)95.182.125.201 (265)91.240.87.225 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS29182

91.240.87.225 (263)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics

Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.

💡 Cryptojacking Detection and Prevention

Cryptojacking hijacks computing resources to mine cryptocurrency without consent. Indicators include unusual CPU usage, specific network connections to mining pools, and JavaScript miners embedded in compromised websites. Server-side cryptojacking can persist undetected for months.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: