
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA suspicious (short/empty) | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +15 | |
| Danger strong hits: 7 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Foreign referer seen | Referer from unrelated external domain | +10 | |
| Danger strong hits: 3 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +75 |
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 59.6.41.4 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | FTP | Medium | File Transfer Protocol — often targeted for anonymous login attacks |
| 22 | SSH | Low | Secure Shell — common brute force target for remote access |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 161 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 161 |
| 3306 | MySQL | High | MySQL database — should never be exposed to the internet |
⚠️ 2 high-risk ports detected on 59.6.41.4. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2014-0237 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-3411 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-0231 | NVD → |
| CVE-2014-5459 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-7125 | NVD → |
| CVE-2008-3844 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-4600 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-10009 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-31629 | NVD → |
| CVE-2003-0225 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-5770 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-4148 | NVD → |
| CVE-2002-0869 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-48795 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-8879 | NVD → |
| CVE-2014-0185 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-8877 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-6420 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-5766 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-7804 | NVD → |
| CVE-2017-11145 | NVD → |
| CVE-2002-1744 | NVD → |
| CVE-2001-1186 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-38408 | NVD → |
| CVE-2002-1745 | NVD → |
🔴 Security scanning identified 325 vulnerability entries on this host. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Consult NVD advisories for details.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
59.6.41.4 has been assigned a threat score of 125/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.
The following attack categories were identified:
IP address 59.6.41.4 has been traced to Seoul, South Korea, operating on the network of Korea Telecom. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 2 malicious requests, averaging approximately 2 requests per day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. Detected suspicious User-Agent anomalies including empty, forged, or rapidly rotating UA strings — characteristic of automated scanning tools. With 146 flagged addresses, South Korea represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 125/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.
This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.
TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.
SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.