ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
54.223.106.244

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-12 02:04:15
First seen: 2026-07-06 03:27:37
Last seen: 2026-07-12 00:56:25
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 580.

BURSTREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
54.223.106.244
Type
VPN
Country
🇨🇳 China
City
Beijing
ISP
Beijing Guanghuan Xinwang Digital
Organization
AWS EC2 (cn-north-1)
Autonomous System
AS55960 Beijing Guanghuan Xinwang Digital
Hit Count
580
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 31/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 31/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-06 03:27:37
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 31/10s (+35), Burst 31/2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-07-12 00:56:25
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Beijing Guanghuan Xinwang Digital
AS55960 · 🇨🇳 China
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 54.223.106.244 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 54.223.106.244.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 54.223.106.244 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

54.223.106.244 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 54.223.106.244 has been traced to Beijing, China, operating on the network of Beijing Guanghuan Xinwang Digital. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 5 days in our monitoring system, producing 580 flagged requests at a rate of ~116/day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. The dual attack vectors of Request Flooding combined with User-Agent Anomaly indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. Our records show 114 malicious IPs originating from China, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 105/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇳 Top threats from China

180.184.55.222 (340)47.93.233.71 (273)135.136.42.150 (255)135.136.42.24 (255)135.136.42.145 (255)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS55960

52.80.59.101 (105)52.80.0.0 (105)52.81.134.218 (80)52.81.3.53 (80)52.80.171.132 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: