ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
51.103.121.50

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 06:22:00
First seen: 2026-04-09 13:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-09 17:00:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 5.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
51.103.121.50
Type
Hosting
Country
🇫🇷 France
City
Paris
ISP
Microsoft
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (francecentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
5
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 158Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 40 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 133 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 160Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 44 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 129 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Burst: 63 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 200 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 43 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 139 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 56 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 185 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 720
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-09 13:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 6 (+100), Danger medium hits: 158 (+60)
2026-04-09 17:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft
AS8075 · 🇫🇷 France
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 51.103.121.50 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 51.103.121.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 51.103.121.50 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 51.103.121.50: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 51.103.121.50 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

07

Neighbors in 51.103.121.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

51.103.121.50 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 51.103.121.50, geolocated to Paris, France, operating on the network of Microsoft, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 5 flagged requests at a rate of ~5/day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. France currently accounts for 201 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇫🇷 Top threats from France

185.177.72.11 (348)185.177.72.10 (348)185.177.72.69 (348)185.177.72.29 (348)185.177.72.23 (348)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.111.44.121 (280)20.111.62.157 (280)20.188.56.166 (280)20.43.58.61 (280)20.199.109.98 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Email Authentication: SPF, DKIM, DMARC

Email authentication protocols work together to prevent spoofing. SPF validates sending servers, DKIM provides cryptographic message signing, and DMARC defines enforcement policies. Full implementation significantly reduces phishing effectiveness.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: