ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
46.30.58.240

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-12 07:41:46
First seen: 2026-07-09 01:08:03
Last seen: 2026-07-12 00:56:09
110

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 110/100. Total malicious requests observed: 239.

BOT_UABURSTREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
46.30.58.240
Type
Hosting
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Espelkamp
ISP
Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co. KG
Organization
Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co.
Autonomous System
AS15817 Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co. KG
Hit Count
239
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 7/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 110
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-09 01:08:03
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 7/2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10), UA bot: Go-http-client (+40)
2026-07-12 00:56:09
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 110/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co. KG
AS15817 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 46.30.58.240 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 46.30.58.240.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 46.30.58.240: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

46.30.58.240 has been assigned a threat score of 110/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 46.30.58.240 has been traced to Espelkamp, Germany, operating on the network of Mittwald CM Service GmbH und Co. KG. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. During its 2-day observation window, we recorded 239 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 119.5 per day on average. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Germany currently accounts for 101 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. With a threat score of 110/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

15.220.152.241 (320)35.246.204.221 (320)185.168.29.98 (313)77.81.65.244 (313)147.90.209.53 (308)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS15817

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Content Security Policy Implementation

Content Security Policy headers instruct browsers to restrict resource loading, mitigating XSS and data injection attacks. Properly configured CSP policies prevent inline script execution, restrict iframe embedding, and control which domains can serve content.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: