IP Threat Report
46.250.229.47
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
Geolocation & Classification
Detection Signatures
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 82 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +100 | |
| Danger medium hits: 4 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +40 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +15 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +20 | |
| Burst: 30 req / 2s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Burst: 83 req / 10s | Abnormally fast request rate — automated scanning | +35 | |
| Danger strong hits: 1 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +25 | |
| 404 ratio >= 60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +25 |
Observed Activity
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Timeline
Network Provider
Recommendations
Actions taken & recommended
- IP 46.250.229.47 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
- Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
- Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 46.250.229.0/24
- Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
- Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web
🔎 Directory Scan Defense
IP 46.250.229.47 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.
🌊 Traffic Flood Defense
IP 46.250.229.47 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.
Neighbors in 46.250.229.0/24
Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.
Open Ports & Services
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 443 | HTTPS | Low | HTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic |
| 5000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5000 |
| 8080 | HTTP-Alt | Low | HTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies |
| 8443 | HTTPS-Alt | Low | Service on port 8443 |
| 9080 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 9080 |
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1735 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-12084 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-11236 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-2940 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-8927 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-6491 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-14180 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-1217 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-44487 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-3205 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-2757 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-13836 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-1874 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-11235 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-11233 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-8925 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-4577 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-36632 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-3720 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-9026 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-5458 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-12781 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-14177 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-1861 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-3096 | NVD → |
🔴 This host has 42 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
Blacklist Status (DNSBL)
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
Threat Analysis
46.250.229.47 has been assigned a threat score of 245/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.
The following attack categories were identified:
📊 Threat Analysis
The address 46.250.229.47 originates from Singapore, Singapore, operating on the network of Contabo Asia Private Limited. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 2 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 2 per day on average. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. Singapore currently accounts for 135 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. With a threat score of 245/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Related Threats
🇸🇬 Top threats from Singapore
85.203.23.12 (340)85.203.23.31 (330)84.17.39.195 (325)192.166.246.30 (325)85.203.21.101 (320)View all →🏢 Same network: AS141995
62.72.43.237 (305)194.233.69.211 (273)62.146.239.75 (255)217.216.32.203 (230)217.216.32.150 (230)View all →Security Intelligence
💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics
Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.
💡 Threat Score Calculation Methods
Threat scoring combines multiple signals — request patterns, known signatures, IP reputation, geographic risk, and behavioral analysis — into a single actionable metric. Weighted scoring models allow tuning sensitivity to balance security with usability.