ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
4.232.88.180

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-13 13:47:32
First seen: 2026-08-12 21:46:39
Last seen: 2026-08-16 01:03:30
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 392.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
4.232.88.180
Type
Hosting
Country
🇮🇹 Italy
City
Milan
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (italynorth)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
392
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst 104/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 182/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 34/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 43/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 46/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 49/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 52/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 86/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 93/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 98/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 236Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 94Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger strong hits: 28High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 745
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-08-12 21:46:39
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst 104/10s (+35), Burst 182/10s (+35)
2026-08-16 01:03:30
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇮🇹 Italy
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 4.232.88.180 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 4.232.88.180 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 4.232.88.180 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 4.232.88.180: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

4.232.88.180 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 4.232.88.180, located in Milan, Italy, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Over a period of 3 days, this IP generated 392 malicious requests, averaging approximately 130.7 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. The combination of 3 distinct attack vectors indicates a sophisticated, multi-pronged threat actor deploying automated tools that probe multiple attack surfaces simultaneously. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇮🇹 Top threats from Italy

172.213.216.126 (280)172.213.17.107 (280)72.146.20.230 (280)172.213.8.106 (280)172.213.225.209 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

68.155.155.199 (320)20.127.136.245 (318)20.151.200.44 (315)20.220.203.117 (280)20.79.30.30 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Automated Incident Response

Automated response systems can block threats in milliseconds, far faster than human analysts. However, automation requires careful safeguards — rate limits on blocking actions, automatic expiration, and human review queues prevent automated systems from causing self-inflicted outages.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: