ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
4.232.144.219

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-10-24 18:09:04
First seen: 2026-09-25 14:05:49
Last seen: 2026-10-04 00:59:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1132.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
4.232.144.219
Type
Hosting
Country
🇮🇹 Italy
City
Milan
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (italynorth)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
1132
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst 101/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 110/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 116/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 124/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 127/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 149/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 154/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 158/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 177/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 178/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 34/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 35/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 36/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 37/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 38/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 39/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 40/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 45/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 46/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 49/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 50/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 92/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 96/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 98/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 99/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 149Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 272Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 293Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 342Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 394Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 442Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 14High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 140High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 164High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 245High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 246High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 312High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 328High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 82High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 2110
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-09-25 14:05:49
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst 101/10s (+35)
2026-10-04 00:59:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇮🇹 Italy

We have detected 1852 malicious IPs from this autonomous system.

View all IPs from AS8075 →
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 4.232.144.219 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 4.232.144.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 4.232.144.219: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 4.232.144.219.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 4.232.144.219 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 4.232.144.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

4.232.144.219 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 4.232.144.219, geolocated to Milan, Italy, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, as a source of suspicious network activity. Our sensors captured 1,132 malicious requests from this address across a 8-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~141.5 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. Our records show 716 malicious IPs originating from Italy, positioning it as a major contributor to global threat activity. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇮🇹 Top threats from Italy

152.89.168.29 (330)34.17.191.22 (320)141.11.36.94 (305)2.57.170.183 (305)2.57.170.88 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

68.155.155.199 (320)20.127.136.245 (318)20.151.200.44 (315)20.92.77.159 (310)20.210.128.125 (310)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 SSH Brute Force Defense

SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: