IP Threat Report
37.235.105.210
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
Geolocation & Classification
Detection Signatures
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danger strong hits: 3 | High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits | +75 | |
| Danger medium hits: 2 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +20 |
Observed Activity
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
Timeline
Network Provider
Recommendations
Actions taken & recommended
- IP 37.235.105.210 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
- Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
- Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
- Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web
⚙️ Defensive Recommendations
Block 37.235.105.210 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.
Open Ports & Services
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | FTP | Medium | File Transfer Protocol — often targeted for anonymous login attacks |
| 25 | SMTP | Medium | SMTP mail server — can be abused for spam relay |
| 80 | HTTP | Low | HTTP web server — standard web traffic |
| 110 | POP3 | Low | Service on port 110 |
| 143 | IMAP | Low | Service on port 143 |
| 465 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 465 |
| 587 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 587 |
| 993 | IMAPS | Low | Service on port 993 |
| 995 | POP3S | Low | Service on port 995 |
| 8080 | HTTP-Alt | Low | HTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies |
| 8081 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8081 |
| 8888 | HTTP-Alt | Low | Service on port 8888 |
⚠️ 1 high-risk port detected on 37.235.105.210. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.
| CVE ID | Link |
|---|---|
| CVE-2025-13837 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-28861 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-9287 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-42919 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-24329 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-3737 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-3720 | NVD → |
| CVE-2016-3189 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-36632 | NVD → |
| CVE-2007-4559 | NVD → |
| CVE-2023-40217 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-3733 | NVD → |
| CVE-2024-6232 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-13836 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-0391 | NVD → |
| CVE-2013-0340 | NVD → |
| CVE-2015-20107 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-37454 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-29921 | NVD → |
| CVE-2022-26488 | NVD → |
| CVE-2009-2940 | NVD → |
| CVE-2018-25032 | NVD → |
| CVE-2021-3426 | NVD → |
| CVE-2025-12781 | NVD → |
| CVE-2020-29396 | NVD → |
🔴 This host has 32 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
Blacklist Status (DNSBL)
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
Threat Analysis
37.235.105.210 has been assigned a threat score of 95/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.
📊 Threat Analysis
Network traffic from 37.235.105.210, located in Prague, Czech Republic, operating on the network of SH.cz s.r.o., has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. With 90 flagged addresses, Czech Republic represents a notable presence in our threat database. At 95/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Related Threats
🇨🇿 Top threats from Czech Republic
82.118.30.24 (255)82.118.30.31 (255)82.118.30.19 (255)82.118.30.22 (255)82.118.30.12 (255)View all →🏢 Same network: AS39392
View all →Security Intelligence
💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors
WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.
💡 Certificate Transparency Monitoring
Certificate Transparency logs record all publicly trusted TLS certificates. Monitoring these logs reveals unauthorized certificate issuance, phishing domain preparation, and shadow IT — providing early warning of attacks targeting an organizations domain.