ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
35.95.44.48

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-21 19:59:30
First seen: 2026-04-09 11:00:04
Last seen: 2026-04-09 11:00:04
125

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 125/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

BOT_UADANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBE
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
35.95.44.48
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Portland
ISP
Amazon.com, Inc.
Organization
AWS EC2 (us-west-2)
Autonomous System
AS16509 Amazon.com, Inc.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: pythonKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Σ = 125
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-09 11:00:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: python (+40), Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-04-09 11:00:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 125/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Amazon.com, Inc.
AS16509 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 35.95.44.48 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 35.95.44.48 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 35.95.44.48 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

35.95.44.48 has been assigned a threat score of 125/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 35.95.44.48, located in Portland, United States, operating on the network of Amazon.com, Inc., has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 1 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1 per day on average. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Path Enumeration indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 130 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 125/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS16509

15.220.152.241 (320)18.219.106.176 (315)15.220.169.114 (280)108.136.131.13 (265)54.206.58.169 (263)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: