ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
34.32.102.1

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-21 18:43:42
First seen: 2026-04-30 18:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-30 18:00:06
160

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 160/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
34.32.102.1
Type
Hosting
Country
🇩🇪 Germany
City
Berlin
ISP
Google LLC
Organization
Google Cloud
Autonomous System
AS396982 Google LLC
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger strong hits: 5High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Burst: 5 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 160
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-30 18:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger strong hits: 5 (+100), Burst: 5 req / 2s (+35)
2026-04-30 18:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 160/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Google LLC
AS396982 · 🇩🇪 Germany
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 34.32.102.1 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 34.32.102.1: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 34.32.102.1 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

34.32.102.1 has been assigned a threat score of 160/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 34.32.102.1 has been traced to Berlin, Germany, operating on the network of Google LLC. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (User-Agent Anomaly and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Germany currently accounts for 103 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. With a threat score of 160/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇪 Top threats from Germany

15.220.152.241 (320)77.81.65.244 (313)185.168.29.98 (313)91.217.249.222 (305)212.30.36.219 (305)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS396982

34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)34.22.208.175 (285)34.166.187.0 (285)34.128.70.180 (285)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: