ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
34.169.18.244

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 06:58:43
First seen: 2026-02-28 05:00:06
Last seen: 2026-02-28 06:00:07
180

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 180/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
34.169.18.244
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
The Dalles
ISP
Google LLC
Organization
Google Cloud (us-west1)
Autonomous System
AS396982 Google LLC
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 14 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 14 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Burst: 13 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 215
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-28 05:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger medium hits: 4 (+40), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-02-28 06:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 180/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Google LLC
AS396982 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 34.169.18.244 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 34.169.18.244 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 34.169.18.244: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 34.169.18.244 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (2)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
443HTTPSLowHTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (6)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2008-3844NVD →
CVE-2025-32728NVD →
CVE-2023-51767NVD →
CVE-2007-2768NVD →
CVE-2025-26465NVD →
CVE-2025-26466NVD →

🔴 Security scanning identified 6 vulnerability entries on this host. Multiple vulnerabilities suggest gaps in patch management. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
openbsd:openssh:9.9
Hostnames: 244.18.169.34.bc.googleusercontent.com
PTR: 244.18.169.34.bc.googleusercontent.com

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

34.169.18.244 has been assigned a threat score of 180/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 34.169.18.244, geolocated to The Dalles, United States, operating on the network of Google LLC, as a source of suspicious network activity. Our sensors captured 2 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~2 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The combination of 3 distinct attack vectors indicates a sophisticated, multi-pronged threat actor deploying automated tools that probe multiple attack surfaces simultaneously. Our records show 142 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. At 180/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS396982

34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)34.22.208.175 (285)34.166.187.0 (285)34.128.70.180 (285)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: