ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
34.10.79.122

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 07:15:16
First seen: 2026-03-09 04:00:06
Last seen: 2026-03-09 04:00:06
165

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 165/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
34.10.79.122
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Council Bluffs
ISP
Google LLC
Organization
Google Cloud (us-central1)
Autonomous System
AS396982 Google LLC
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 19 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 21 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 165
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-09 04:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), Burst: 19 req / 2s (+35)
2026-03-09 04:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 165/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Google LLC
AS396982 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 34.10.79.122 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 34.10.79.122 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 34.10.79.122.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

34.10.79.122 has been assigned a threat score of 165/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 34.10.79.122 to malicious activity originating from Council Bluffs, United States, operating on the network of Google LLC. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Two attack patterns were identified (User-Agent Anomaly and Request Flooding), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Our records show 142 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 165/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS396982

34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)34.22.208.175 (285)34.166.187.0 (285)34.128.70.180 (285)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 XML External Entity (XXE) Attacks

XXE vulnerabilities in XML parsers allow attackers to read local files, perform SSRF, and execute denial of service attacks. Many legacy applications and APIs remain vulnerable to XXE due to insecure default XML parser configurations.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: