ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
31.76.60.172

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-10-26 10:35:40
First seen: 2026-09-24 10:30:32
Last seen: 2026-10-04 00:53:58
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 250.

BURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
31.76.60.172
Type
Hosting
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
London
ISP
SERV.HOST GROUP LTD
Organization
SERV.HOST GROUP LTD
Autonomous System
AS207957 SERV.HOST GROUP LTD
Hit Count
250
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 15/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 15/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 17/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 21/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 140
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-09-24 10:30:32
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 15/10s (+35), Burst 15/2s (+35), Burst 17/2s (+35)
2026-10-04 00:53:58
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

SERV.HOST GROUP LTD
AS207957 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom

We have detected 7 malicious IPs from this autonomous system.

View all IPs from AS207957 →
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 31.76.60.172 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 31.76.60.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 31.76.60.172 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

07

Neighbors in 31.76.60.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

31.76.60.172 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 31.76.60.172 to malicious activity originating from London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of SERV.HOST GROUP LTD. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 9 days, this IP generated 250 malicious requests, averaging approximately 27.8 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. The IP is engaged in request flooding, sending traffic at rates designed to exhaust server capacity. With 3,207 flagged addresses, United Kingdom represents a major presence in our threat database. At 70/100, this IP warrants immediate defensive action.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

45.86.203.126 (350)45.138.12.41 (350)91.230.225.114 (350)45.138.12.46 (350)185.192.71.72 (350)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS207957

193.163.203.240 (155)91.196.32.163 (135)91.196.33.55 (93)144.31.213.158 (90)31.76.60.160 (70)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Botnet Command and Control Evolution

Botnet C2 infrastructure has evolved from centralized IRC channels to resilient peer-to-peer networks, domain generation algorithms, and blockchain-based communication. This evolution makes botnet takedowns increasingly difficult and expensive.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: