ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
31.6.41.11

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-13 01:26:05
First seen: 2026-07-31 06:26:25
Last seen: 2026-08-02 00:53:07
220

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 220/100. Total malicious requests observed: 105.

BURSTDANGER_PATHREDIRECT_PROBEREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
31.6.41.11
Type
VPN
Country
🇨🇭 Switzerland
City
Zurich
ISP
YHC
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS22363 Powerhouse Management, Inc.
Hit Count
105
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 12/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 13/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 13/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
Danger strong hits: 3High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+75
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 255
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-31 06:26:25
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 12/2s (+35), Burst 13/10s (+35), Burst 13/2s (+35)
2026-08-02 00:53:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 220/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

YHC
AS22363 · 🇨🇭 Switzerland
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 31.6.41.11 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 31.6.41.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 31.6.41.11.

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 31.6.41.11 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 31.6.41.11 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

07

Neighbors in 31.6.41.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

31.6.41.11 has been assigned a threat score of 220/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingPath EnumerationUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 31.6.41.11, geolocated to Zurich, Switzerland, operating on the network of YHC, as a source of suspicious network activity. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 105 malicious requests, averaging approximately 105 requests per day. This IP is identified as a VPN or proxy endpoint, commonly used to mask the true origin of attack traffic and bypass geographic or reputation-based blocking. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. At 220/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇭 Top threats from Switzerland

31.6.41.4 (210)31.6.41.16 (160)31.6.41.3 (160)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS22363

128.90.161.1 (265)128.90.128.3 (265)128.90.141.19 (230)128.90.141.2 (230)128.90.145.15 (220)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Log Correlation and SIEM Integration

Correlating logs across web servers, firewalls, DNS, and authentication systems reveals attack patterns invisible in individual log sources. Modern SIEM platforms use statistical analysis to connect related events across time and systems.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: