ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
31.56.240.204

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 10:16:02
First seen: 2026-05-24 00:07:01
Last seen: 2026-05-24 09:51:29
80

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 80/100. Total malicious requests observed: 40.

BURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
31.56.240.204
Type
Hosting
Country
🇰🇿 KZ
City
Astana
ISP
Megahost Kazakhstan TOO
Organization
Megahost Kazakhstan TOO
Autonomous System
AS208450 Megahost Kazakhstan TOO
Hit Count
40
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 13/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 13/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 80
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-24 00:07:01
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 13/10s (+35), Burst 13/2s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-05-24 09:51:29
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 80/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Megahost Kazakhstan TOO
AS208450 · 🇰🇿 KZ
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 31.56.240.204 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 31.56.240.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 31.56.240.204.

07

Neighbors in 31.56.240.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

31.56.240.204 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 31.56.240.204, located in Astana, KZ, operating on the network of Megahost Kazakhstan TOO, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. Our sensors captured 40 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~40 requests per day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. Rate-based attacks from this IP aim to overwhelm server resources through high-volume request flooding. Our records show 101 malicious IPs originating from KZ, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A threat score of 80/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇰🇿 Top threats from KZ

178.20.210.57 (195)91.147.92.98 (180)165.140.199.93 (140)165.140.199.99 (140)165.140.199.80 (105)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS208450

193.39.68.235 (80)45.136.59.98 (70)31.56.240.246 (70)45.136.59.95 (70)31.56.240.245 (70)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 GeoIP Blocking Considerations

Blocking traffic from specific countries reduces attack surface but impacts legitimate international users. Effective geo-based policies use tiered approaches — blocking, rate limiting, or requiring additional verification based on risk assessment.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: