ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
23.100.96.92

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 10:00:16
First seen: 2026-05-17 16:00:05
Last seen: 2026-05-24 10:00:54
230

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 230/100. Total malicious requests observed: 244.

BURSTDANGER_PATH
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
23.100.96.92
Type
Hosting
Country
🇯🇵 Japan
City
Tokyo
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (japaneast)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
244
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 12/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 42/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 12 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 42 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 40Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 11High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 13High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Σ = 400
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-17 16:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 12/2s (+35), Burst 42/10s (+35), Burst: 12 req / 2s (+35)
2026-05-24 10:00:54
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 230/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇯🇵 Japan
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 23.100.96.92 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 23.100.96.92.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

23.100.96.92 has been assigned a threat score of 230/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 23.100.96.92 to malicious activity originating from Tokyo, Japan, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. During its 6-day observation window, we recorded 244 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 40.7 per day on average. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. Rate-based attacks from this IP aim to overwhelm server resources through high-volume request flooding. Our records show 101 malicious IPs originating from Japan, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A score of 230/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇵 Top threats from Japan

103.163.220.216 (340)35.243.110.60 (288)20.89.56.154 (280)20.27.221.169 (280)20.210.188.132 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

74.241.249.229 (340)20.151.111.128 (308)4.182.24.88 (285)20.65.61.3 (283)4.205.39.97 (283)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Passive DNS for Threat Hunting

Passive DNS databases record historical DNS resolution data, enabling analysts to track domain changes, identify related infrastructure, and discover malicious domains sharing hosting with known threats. This historical context is invaluable for threat investigation.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: