ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
222.211.163.2

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 12:55:09
First seen: 2026-03-13 01:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-13 01:00:05
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

DANGER_PATHREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
222.211.163.2
Type
Residential
Country
🇨🇳 China
City
Chengdu
ISP
Chinanet
Organization
Chinanet SC
Autonomous System
AS4134 CHINANET-BACKBONE
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-13 01:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-03-13 01:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Chinanet
AS4134 · 🇨🇳 China
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 222.211.163.2 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 222.211.163.2 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

222.211.163.2 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 222.211.163.2, located in Chengdu, China, operating on the network of Chinanet, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 2 flagged requests at a rate of ~2/day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. Our records show 194 malicious IPs originating from China, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A threat score of 70/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇳 Top threats from China

180.184.55.222 (340)117.50.120.215 (235)115.191.1.205 (235)123.58.16.244 (235)43.142.47.248 (230)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS4134

115.235.12.158 (220)111.225.149.144 (180)111.225.149.226 (180)222.80.214.7 (175)111.225.148.111 (170)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 XML External Entity (XXE) Attacks

XXE vulnerabilities in XML parsers allow attackers to read local files, perform SSRF, and execute denial of service attacks. Many legacy applications and APIs remain vulnerable to XXE due to insecure default XML parser configurations.

💡 VPN Exit Node Reputation

VPN exit nodes aggregate traffic from many users, creating mixed reputation profiles. While legitimate users seek privacy, attackers exploit VPN services to anonymize malicious activity, making IP-based blocking of VPN nodes a complex policy decision.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: