ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
221.207.34.18

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 08:15:28
First seen: 2026-05-27 05:21:01
Last seen: 2026-05-27 07:55:06
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 8.

BURSTREFERERUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
221.207.34.18
Type
Unknown
Country
🇤🇤 ??
City
Unknown
ISP
Unknown
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
8
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 12/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 21/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-27 05:21:01
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 12/2s (+35), Burst 21/10s (+35), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-05-27 07:55:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 221.207.34.18 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 221.207.34.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 221.207.34.18 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 221.207.34.18: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

07

Neighbors in 221.207.34.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

221.207.34.18 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 221.207.34.18 to malicious activity originating from an unknown location. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 8 malicious requests, averaging approximately 8 requests per day. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and User-Agent Anomaly), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. With a threat score of 105/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

11

Related Threats

🇤🇤 Top threats from ??

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Subnet-Level vs IP-Level Blocking

When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: