ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
216.10.217.50

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-29 19:42:02
First seen: 2026-06-20 23:47:58
Last seen: 2026-06-21 09:49:41
60

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 60/100. Total malicious requests observed: 10.

01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
216.10.217.50
Type
Residential
Country
🇯🇲 JM
City
Kingston
ISP
FLOW
Organization
Columbus Communications Jamaica Limited
Autonomous System
AS30689 FLOW
Hit Count
10
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Directory ScanBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-06-20 23:47:58
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Directory Scan
2026-06-21 09:49:41
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 60/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

FLOW
AS30689 · 🇯🇲 JM
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 216.10.217.50 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 216.10.217.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 216.10.217.50 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

07

Neighbors in 216.10.217.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

216.10.217.50 has been assigned a threat score of 60/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 216.10.217.50 originates from Kingston, JM, operating on the network of FLOW. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 10 malicious requests, averaging approximately 10 requests per day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. Our records show 29 malicious IPs originating from JM, positioning it as a notable contributor to global threat activity. At 60/100, this IP presents a meaningful threat. Implement rate limiting with escalation to blocking.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇯🇲 Top threats from JM

83.219.96.25 (255)83.219.96.26 (255)83.219.96.28 (255)83.219.96.27 (255)83.219.96.24 (255)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS30689

216.10.217.131 (70)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Race Condition Vulnerabilities

Race conditions occur when application behavior depends on the timing of concurrent operations. Attackers exploit these timing windows to bypass limits, duplicate transactions, or escalate privileges by sending carefully timed parallel requests.

💡 Security Header Best Practices

HTTP security headers provide defense-in-depth with minimal implementation effort. Key headers include Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, each addressing specific attack vectors.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: