ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
213.152.162.5

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-14 01:28:27
First seen: 2026-09-09 13:22:00
Last seen: 2026-09-13 01:12:08
75

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 75/100. Total malicious requests observed: 130.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
213.152.162.5
Type
Hosting
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Haarlem
ISP
Global Layer network
Organization
Global Layer B.V.
Autonomous System
AS49453 Global Layer B.V.
Hit Count
130
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Danger medium hits: 5Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+50
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 75
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-09-09 13:22:00
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Danger medium hits: 5 (+50), Foreign referer (+10)
2026-09-13 01:12:08
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 75/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Global Layer network
AS49453 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 213.152.162.5 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 213.152.162.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 213.152.162.5: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 213.152.162.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

213.152.162.5 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

213.152.162.5 is registered in Haarlem, Netherlands, operating on the network of Global Layer network. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. The address has been active for 3 days in our monitoring system, producing 130 flagged requests at a rate of ~43.3/day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. Our records show 104 malicious IPs originating from Netherlands, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. A threat score of 75/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

91.92.43.144 (358)91.92.43.186 (358)91.92.43.190 (358)91.92.43.157 (358)91.92.43.153 (358)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS49453

134.19.178.162 (235)5.188.86.234 (220)213.152.162.74 (165)134.19.184.158 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.

💡 Passive DNS for Threat Hunting

Passive DNS databases record historical DNS resolution data, enabling analysts to track domain changes, identify related infrastructure, and discover malicious domains sharing hosting with known threats. This historical context is invaluable for threat investigation.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: