ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
212.30.37.33

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-29 21:09:42
First seen: 2026-06-04 08:11:47
Last seen: 2026-06-07 20:24:11
100

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 100/100. Total malicious requests observed: 43.

01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
212.30.37.33
Type
Unknown
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Rotterdam
ISP
GSL Networks Pty LTD
Organization
GSL Networks Pty LTD
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
43
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Malicious ActivityBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-06-04 08:11:47
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Malicious Activity
2026-06-07 20:24:11
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 100/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 212.30.37.33 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 212.30.37.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 212.30.37.33 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

07

Neighbors in 212.30.37.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

212.30.37.33 has been assigned a threat score of 100/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 212.30.37.33 originates from Rotterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of GSL Networks Pty LTD. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Our sensors captured 43 malicious requests from this address across a 3-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~14.3 requests per day. With 121 flagged addresses, Netherlands represents a significant presence in our threat database. A score of 100/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

91.92.43.144 (358)91.92.43.186 (358)91.92.43.190 (358)91.92.43.157 (358)91.92.43.153 (358)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 Security Implications

Modern HTTP protocols introduce new attack surfaces including stream multiplexing abuse, header compression attacks (HPACK bombing), and rapid reset attacks. Security tools must evolve to handle these protocol-specific threats effectively.

💡 Security Header Best Practices

HTTP security headers provide defense-in-depth with minimal implementation effort. Key headers include Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, each addressing specific attack vectors.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: