ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
206.214.93.165

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 13:02:58
First seen: 2026-04-12 15:00:05
Last seen: 2026-04-17 04:00:05
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

DANGER_PATHREFERERRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBE
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
206.214.93.165
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Phoenix
ISP
Eonix Corporation
Organization
GIA Internet Holdings LLC
Autonomous System
AS62904 Eonix Corporation
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Danger medium hits: 10Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Σ = 145
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-12 15:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 4 (+40), Foreign referer seen (+10), Danger medium hits: 10 (+60)
2026-04-17 04:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Eonix Corporation
AS62904 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 206.214.93.165 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 206.214.93.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 206.214.93.165: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 206.214.93.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (5)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
1344UnknownLowService on port 1344
3128UnknownLowService on port 3128
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2019-12519NVD →
CVE-2019-18676NVD →
CVE-2019-12523NVD →
CVE-2016-4554NVD →
CVE-2018-19132NVD →
CVE-2024-45802NVD →
CVE-2018-19131NVD →
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2025-59362NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2021-28116NVD →
CVE-2019-12529NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2019-13345NVD →
CVE-2023-5824NVD →
CVE-2020-8449NVD →
CVE-2020-25097NVD →
CVE-2015-5400NVD →
CVE-2019-18860NVD →
CVE-2020-8517NVD →
CVE-2023-46846NVD →
CVE-2019-12522NVD →
CVE-2026-33526NVD →
CVE-2016-3947NVD →
CVE-2026-33515NVD →
+34 more

🔴 Security scanning identified 59 vulnerability entries on this host. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.1.23

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

206.214.93.165 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 206.214.93.165, geolocated to Phoenix, United States, operating on the network of Eonix Corporation, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 4 days in our monitoring system, producing 2 flagged requests at a rate of ~0.5/day. This is a residential IP address, suggesting a compromised home device such as a router, smart appliance, or infected workstation participating in a botnet. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. With 133 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. At 105/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS62904

170.130.163.233 (165)170.130.163.94 (165)107.158.200.191 (105)104.206.162.86 (105)107.158.200.144 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Directory Traversal Attacks

Path traversal attacks attempt to access files outside the intended directory by manipulating file path references. Attackers use sequences like ../ to reach sensitive system files such as /etc/passwd or application configuration files.

💡 Security Header Best Practices

HTTP security headers provide defense-in-depth with minimal implementation effort. Key headers include Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Permissions-Policy, each addressing specific attack vectors.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: