ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.9.15.100

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 00:53:53
First seen: 2026-07-19 22:21:41
Last seen: 2026-07-26 04:04:03
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1126.

BURSTDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.9.15.100
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Des Moines
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (centralus)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
1126
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst 15/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 17/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 18/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 21/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 60/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 75/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 76/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 18Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 273Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 411Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger medium hits: 546Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Danger strong hits: 117High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 14High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 234High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger strong hits: 235High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe 302→404Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
UA suspiciousBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Σ = 935
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-19 22:21:41
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Burst 15/2s (+35), Burst 17/2s (+35)
2026-07-26 04:04:03
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.9.15.100 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 20.9.15.100 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 20.9.15.100.

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 20.9.15.100: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.9.15.100 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest FloodingUser-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 20.9.15.100 to malicious activity originating from Des Moines, United States, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. During its 6-day observation window, we recorded 1,126 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 187.7 per day on average. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. With 17 flagged addresses, United States represents a notable presence in our threat database. A score of 280/100 places this address in the top tier of severity. Block and investigate any historical connections.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

168.62.180.116 (280)20.230.87.222 (280)20.12.183.135 (280)135.119.63.200 (280)20.9.82.255 (280)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.226.81.88 (280)20.48.26.146 (280)191.234.169.57 (280)52.237.113.70 (280)104.208.65.18 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Automated Incident Response

Automated response systems can block threats in milliseconds, far faster than human analysts. However, automation requires careful safeguards — rate limits on blocking actions, automatic expiration, and human review queues prevent automated systems from causing self-inflicted outages.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: