ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.151.227.112

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 07:29:04
First seen: 2026-04-14 16:00:05
Last seen: 2026-04-14 20:00:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 6.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.151.227.112
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇦 Canada
City
Toronto
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (canadacentral)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
6
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 4High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 355Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 23 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 78 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 83 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger medium hits: 93Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 19 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 70 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 80 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 10High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 793Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 20 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 69 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 8High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 533Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 21 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 905
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-14 16:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 4 (+100), Danger medium hits: 355 (+60)
2026-04-14 20:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇨🇦 Canada
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.151.227.112 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 20.151.227.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 20.151.227.112: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 20.151.227.112: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 20.151.227.112 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

07

Neighbors in 20.151.227.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
6432UnknownLowService on port 6432

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.151.227.112 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 20.151.227.112 has been traced to Toronto, Canada, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 6 flagged requests at a rate of ~6/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. With 3 different attack patterns detected, this IP exhibits behavior characteristic of advanced automated scanning frameworks. Our records show 102 malicious IPs originating from Canada, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 280/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇦 Top threats from Canada

45.91.23.64 (305)147.15.149.40 (300)148.116.72.171 (300)89.251.0.24 (295)89.251.0.128 (295)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

74.241.249.229 (340)4.182.24.88 (285)20.65.61.3 (283)4.205.39.97 (283)20.29.71.103 (283)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Rate Limiting and Throttling Strategies

Effective rate limiting must balance protection against abuse with allowing legitimate traffic bursts. Sliding window algorithms, token buckets, and adaptive thresholds based on client reputation provide layered defense against flooding attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: