ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.121.25.154

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:23:05
First seen: 2026-03-22 20:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-23 01:00:06
280

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 280/100. Total malicious requests observed: 5.

UA_SUSDANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.121.25.154
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Boydton
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (eastus)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
5
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 52High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 298Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 24 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 82 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 78High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Burst: 25 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 88 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 84 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 23 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 80 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 81 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 590
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-22 20:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA suspicious (short/empty) (+15), Danger strong hits: 52 (+100), Danger medium hits: 298 (+60)
2026-03-23 01:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 280/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.121.25.154 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 User-Agent Anomaly Defense

IP 20.121.25.154 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.

🔎 Directory Scan Defense

IP 20.121.25.154 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 20.121.25.154.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.121.25.154 has been assigned a threat score of 280/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 20.121.25.154, geolocated to Boydton, United States, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation, as a source of suspicious network activity. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 5 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 5 per day on average. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. With 130 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. At 280/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

20.65.61.3 (283)20.29.71.103 (283)172.190.142.176 (280)20.96.32.182 (280)20.163.110.166 (280)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 HTTP Header Analysis for Threat Detection

Examining HTTP headers beyond User-Agent reveals attack tools and automated scripts. Missing standard headers, unusual ordering, non-standard values, and inconsistencies with claimed client identity all serve as reliable detection signals.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: