ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
20.120.106.23

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-21 17:05:48
First seen: 2026-04-06 11:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-18 17:00:05
195

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 195/100. Total malicious requests observed: 6.

UA_CHANGEDDANGER_PATHBURSTBOT_UAREFERERUA_SUS
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
20.120.106.23
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Boydton
ISP
Microsoft Corporation
Organization
Microsoft Azure Cloud (eastus)
Autonomous System
AS8075 Microsoft Corporation
Hit Count
6
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA changed for same IPMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Danger strong hits: 27High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Burst: 146 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 146 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
UA suspicious (short/empty)Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+15
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Σ = 285
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-06 11:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA changed for same IP (+25), Danger strong hits: 27 (+100), Burst: 146 req / 2s (+35)
2026-04-18 17:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 195/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Microsoft Corporation
AS8075 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 20.120.106.23 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 20.120.106.23: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 20.120.106.23 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
3389RDPHighRemote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks

⚠️ Network scanning reveals 1 dangerous service exposed on 20.120.106.23. Exposed RDP (3389) is the #1 entry point for ransomware attacks. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

20.120.106.23 has been assigned a threat score of 195/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 20.120.106.23 has been traced to Boydton, United States, operating on the network of Microsoft Corporation. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 12 days in our monitoring system, producing 6 flagged requests at a rate of ~0.5/day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. Our records show 101 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 195/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS8075

74.241.249.229 (340)4.182.24.88 (285)20.65.61.3 (283)4.205.39.97 (283)20.29.71.103 (283)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 TLS Fingerprinting (JA3/JA4)

TLS fingerprinting creates unique identifiers based on how clients negotiate encrypted connections. The JA3 and JA4 methods generate hashes from TLS ClientHello parameters, enabling identification of specific tools and malware regardless of IP address changes.

💡 Container Security Challenges

Containerized applications face unique security challenges including vulnerable base images, excessive privileges, shared kernel attacks, and insecure orchestration configurations. Runtime security monitoring and immutable container policies mitigate these risks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: