ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
2.24.202.19

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:07:01
First seen: 2026-05-21 07:50:40
Last seen: 2026-05-24 09:58:46
75

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 75/100. Total malicious requests observed: 138.

DANGER_PATHUA_CHANGED
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
2.24.202.19
Type
Hosting
Country
🇬🇧 United Kingdom
City
London
ISP
EE Limited
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS47583 Hostinger International Limited
Hit Count
138
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
UA changedMultiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique+25
Σ = 75
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-05-21 07:50:40
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), UA changed (+25)
2026-05-24 09:58:46
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 75/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

EE Limited
AS47583 · 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 2.24.202.19 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 2.24.202.19: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

2.24.202.19 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent Anomaly

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 2.24.202.19, geolocated to London, United Kingdom, operating on the network of EE Limited, as a source of suspicious network activity. Over a period of 3 days, this IP generated 138 malicious requests, averaging approximately 46 requests per day. Operating from datacenter infrastructure, this IP is typical of addresses used in organized attack operations. Cloud and VPS providers are commonly exploited as launching platforms for automated scanning. The IP exhibits User-Agent manipulation, switching between different browser identities or sending empty headers. At 75/100, this IP warrants immediate defensive action.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇬🇧 Top threats from United Kingdom

77.37.34.190 (160)153.92.208.93 (85)2.24.211.245 (75)2.24.212.177 (75)187.124.208.132 (75)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS47583

77.37.92.171 (240)45.132.241.244 (230)187.127.111.135 (220)82.25.102.234 (215)178.16.128.177 (195)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 API Abuse and Enumeration

Modern attacks increasingly target APIs rather than traditional web interfaces. Attackers enumerate endpoints, test for broken authentication, and exploit excessive data exposure. API attacks are harder to detect as they mimic legitimate programmatic access patterns.

💡 Content Security Policy Implementation

Content Security Policy headers instruct browsers to restrict resource loading, mitigating XSS and data injection attacks. Properly configured CSP policies prevent inline script execution, restrict iframe embedding, and control which domains can serve content.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: