ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
196.51.38.75

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 16:14:07
First seen: 2026-04-13 15:00:16
Last seen: 2026-04-23 04:00:05
85

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 85/100. Total malicious requests observed: 2.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
196.51.38.75
Type
Hosting
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Tukwila
ISP
DynaNode LLC
Organization
E-Com Cloud Solution Co., Ltd
Autonomous System
AS400463 DynaNode LLC
Hit Count
2
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 4Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+40
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Danger medium hits: 2Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+20
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-13 15:00:16
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 4 (+40), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-04-23 04:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 85/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

DynaNode LLC
AS400463 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 196.51.38.75 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 196.51.38.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 196.51.38.75: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 196.51.38.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (2)
PortServiceRiskDescription
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2019-12519NVD →
CVE-2019-18676NVD →
CVE-2019-12523NVD →
CVE-2018-19132NVD →
CVE-2024-45802NVD →
CVE-2018-19131NVD →
CVE-2020-24606NVD →
CVE-2023-46847NVD →
CVE-2025-59362NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2021-28116NVD →
CVE-2019-12529NVD →
CVE-2019-18677NVD →
CVE-2019-13345NVD →
CVE-2023-5824NVD →
CVE-2020-8449NVD →
CVE-2020-25097NVD →
CVE-2023-46724NVD →
CVE-2019-18860NVD →
CVE-2020-8517NVD →
CVE-2023-46846NVD →
CVE-2023-49288NVD →
CVE-2019-12522NVD →
CVE-2026-33526NVD →
CVE-2026-33515NVD →
+34 more

🔴 Security scanning identified 59 vulnerability entries on this host. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.5.20

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

196.51.38.75 has been assigned a threat score of 85/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 196.51.38.75, geolocated to Tukwila, United States, operating on the network of DynaNode LLC, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 9 days in our monitoring system, producing 2 flagged requests at a rate of ~0.2/day. The IP is classified as hosting/datacenter infrastructure, commonly associated with rented servers used for automated attack campaigns, botnet command-and-control, or vulnerability scanning at scale. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. Our records show 198 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. The score of 85/100 indicates a confirmed malicious actor. Network-level blocking is appropriate.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS400463

156.241.212.110 (130)196.51.9.71 (130)196.51.88.191 (105)196.51.57.202 (105)196.51.7.223 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Brute Force Attack Mechanics

Brute force attacks systematically try username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access. Modern attacks leverage credential databases from previous breaches, testing millions of combinations using distributed botnets across multiple IP addresses.

💡 CAPTCHA and Bot Detection

CAPTCHAs remain a primary bot defense but face increasing bypass rates from AI-powered solvers. Modern alternatives include invisible behavioral analysis, proof-of-work challenges, and device fingerprinting that detect bots without impacting user experience.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: