ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
193.36.225.161

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 06:15:48
First seen: 2026-04-02 22:00:08
Last seen: 2026-04-02 22:00:08
75

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 75/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
193.36.225.161
Type
VPN/Proxy
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Los Angeles
ISP
F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Organization
VPN Consumer Los Angeles, United States
Autonomous System
AS206092 F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 2High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+50
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Σ = 75
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-02 22:00:08
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 2 (+50), Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15)
2026-04-02 22:00:08
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 75/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED
AS206092 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 193.36.225.161 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 193.36.225.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 193.36.225.161: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 193.36.225.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

193.36.225.161 has been assigned a threat score of 75/100 (High). The IP is rated as a high-level threat. Network administrators should implement blocking rules and monitor for any connections from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 193.36.225.161, geolocated to Los Angeles, United States, operating on the network of F.N.S. HOLDINGS LIMITED, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. The address operates as a VPN/proxy exit node. Attackers route traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their real location and evade IP-based security controls. Active path scanning has been detected — this IP probes for hundreds of common file and directory names. United States currently accounts for 151 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 75/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS206092

103.163.220.216 (340)85.203.21.101 (320)85.203.21.157 (310)85.203.21.172 (305)91.217.249.222 (305)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 WordPress-Specific Attack Vectors

WordPress sites face constant automated attacks targeting xmlrpc.php for brute force amplification, wp-login.php for credential theft, and vulnerable plugins for remote code execution. Over 90% of CMS-based attacks specifically target WordPress installations.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: