ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
193.36.220.36

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-07-30 00:18:39
First seen: 2026-06-19 08:37:30
Last seen: 2026-06-24 21:17:01
100

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 100/100. Total malicious requests observed: 277.

01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
193.36.220.36
Type
Unknown
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Jackson
ISP
GSL Networks Pty LTD
Organization
GSL Networks Pty LTD
Autonomous System
Unknown
Hit Count
277
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Directory ScanBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+0
Σ = 0
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-06-19 08:37:30
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Directory Scan
2026-06-24 21:17:01
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 100/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 193.36.220.36 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 193.36.220.0/24
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ Defensive Recommendations

Block 193.36.220.36 at the network perimeter. Implement defense-in-depth combining IP blocking with application-layer protections.

07

Neighbors in 193.36.220.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

193.36.220.36 has been assigned a threat score of 100/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

📊 Threat Analysis

IP address 193.36.220.36 has been traced to Jackson, United States, operating on the network of GSL Networks Pty LTD. Our threat detection systems have flagged this address based on observed malicious behavior patterns. The address has been active for 5 days in our monitoring system, producing 277 flagged requests at a rate of ~55.4/day. With 142 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. At 100/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.214.122 (350)103.168.66.237 (340)34.187.158.4 (340)34.186.187.208 (340)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Web Application Firewall Strategies

WAFs inspect HTTP traffic to block common attacks but require careful tuning. Overly aggressive rules cause false positives while permissive configurations miss attacks. Modern WAFs combine signature matching with behavioral analysis and machine learning.

💡 Responsible Disclosure Ethics

Responsible disclosure balances public safety with giving vendors time to patch vulnerabilities. The security community generally supports coordinated disclosure timelines, but disagreements about appropriate timeframes and full disclosure continue to drive policy debates.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: