
ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED
| Signature | Description | Points | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| UA changed for same IP | Multiple User-Agents — bot rotation technique | +25 | |
| Danger medium hits: 8 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +60 | |
| Probe pattern 302->404 same path | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +20 | |
| Foreign referer seen | Referer from unrelated external domain | +10 | |
| Imported from old blocklist | Behavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis | +0 | |
| Danger medium hits: 4 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +40 | |
| Danger medium hits: 10 | Medium-risk: admin panels, config files | +60 | |
| 404 ratio 40-60% | Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration | +15 |
Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.
* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.
IP 193.33.66.58 shows suspicious UA behavior. Block empty User-Agent requests. Implement JavaScript-based bot detection for sensitive endpoints.
IP 193.33.66.58 is enumerating directories. Configure fail2ban apache-404 jail after 10+ 404 errors. Disable directory listings. Normalize all 404 responses.
Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.
Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.
| Port | Service | Risk | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3389 | RDP | High | Remote Desktop Protocol — primary target for ransomware attacks |
| 5432 | PostgreSQL | High | PostgreSQL database — direct database access risk |
| 5433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 5433 |
| 6000 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6000 |
| 6002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6002 |
| 6348 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6348 |
| 6352 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6352 |
| 6363 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6363 |
| 6379 | Redis | Critical | Redis in-memory database — frequently misconfigured without auth |
| 6380 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6380 |
| 6400 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6400 |
| 6405 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6405 |
| 6432 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6432 |
| 6433 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6433 |
| 6440 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6440 |
| 6443 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6443 |
| 6887 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6887 |
| 6955 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 6955 |
| 7001 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7001 |
| 7002 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7002 |
| 7003 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7003 |
| 7004 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7004 |
| 7005 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7005 |
| 7010 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7010 |
| 7014 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7014 |
| 7018 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7018 |
| 7020 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7020 |
| 7021 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7021 |
| 7022 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7022 |
| 7057 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7057 |
| 7070 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7070 |
| 7071 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7071 |
| 7078 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7078 |
| 7079 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7079 |
| 7082 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7082 |
| 7083 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7083 |
| 7084 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7084 |
| 7085 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7085 |
| 7087 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7087 |
| 7090 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7090 |
| 7100 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7100 |
| 7105 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7105 |
| 7171 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7171 |
| 7173 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7173 |
| 7218 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 7218 |
| 8502 | Unknown | Low | Service on port 8502 |
⚠️ Network scanning reveals 3 dangerous services exposed on 193.33.66.58. Exposed RDP (3389) is the #1 entry point for ransomware attacks. Open database ports suggest possible data exfiltration risk. These services should not be publicly accessible without strict firewall rules.
Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.
This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.
Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.
193.33.66.58 has been assigned a threat score of 115/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.
The following attack categories were identified:
Threat intelligence analysis has linked 193.33.66.58 to malicious activity originating from Waubay, United States, operating on the network of PureVoltage Hosting Inc.. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Over a period of 27 days, this IP generated 7 malicious requests, averaging approximately 0.3 requests per day. Classified as a hosting IP, this address likely runs on a rented server or cloud instance. Attackers prefer datacenter IPs for their high bandwidth and disposable nature. The dual attack vectors of User-Agent Anomaly combined with Path Enumeration indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. With 198 flagged addresses, United States represents a significant presence in our threat database. With a threat score of 115/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.
This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.
Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.
SSH servers face constant brute force attacks targeting common usernames and weak passwords. Key-based authentication, fail2ban, non-standard ports, and IP allowlisting dramatically reduce the attack surface. Monitoring auth logs reveals active campaigns and compromised credentials.