ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
193.180.212.163

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 07:28:25
First seen: 2026-02-20 00:35:05
Last seen: 2026-02-20 09:10:05
235

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 235/100. Total malicious requests observed: 4.

BOT_UADANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
193.180.212.163
Type
Residential
Country
🇩🇰 DK
City
Nørre Åby
ISP
Webdock.io ApS
Organization
Webdock.io ApS
Autonomous System
AS44803 Webdock.io ApS
Hit Count
4
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
UA bot: Go-http-clientKnown bot/crawler User-Agent detected+40
Danger strong hits: 6High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 6 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Danger strong hits: 10High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Burst: 10 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 10 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 415
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-20 00:35:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
UA bot: Go-http-client (+40), Danger strong hits: 6 (+100), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25)
2026-02-20 09:10:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 235/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Webdock.io ApS
AS44803 · 🇩🇰 DK
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 193.180.212.163 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🤖 Bot Detection

Address UA spoofing from 193.180.212.163: maintain blocklist of known malicious UA strings, require consistent UA across sessions, implement TLS fingerprinting.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 193.180.212.163: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 193.180.212.163.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (9)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
25SMTPMediumSMTP mail server — can be abused for spam relay
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
443HTTPSLowHTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic
465UnknownLowService on port 465
587UnknownLowService on port 587
993IMAPSLowService on port 993
2002UnknownLowService on port 2002
2003UnknownLowService on port 2003
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (6)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2024-25117NVD →
CVE-2007-3205NVD →
CVE-2013-2220NVD →
CVE-2022-4900NVD →
CVE-2024-3566NVD →
CVE-2024-5458NVD →

🔴 Security scanning identified 6 vulnerability entries on this host. Multiple vulnerabilities suggest gaps in patch management. Consult NVD advisories for details.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
apache:http_servercanonical:ubuntu_linuxf5:nginxphp:php:7.4.33openbsd:openssh:9.6p1exim:exim:4.99.1
Hostnames: mail.inwizy.comserver.inwizy.com
PTR: mail.inwizy.com

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

193.180.212.163 has been assigned a threat score of 235/100 (Critical). This is a critical-level threat. Systems administrators should treat this IP as hostile and block all inbound connections without exception.

The following attack categories were identified:

User-Agent AnomalyPath EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 193.180.212.163, geolocated to Nørre Åby, DK, operating on the network of Webdock.io ApS, as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 4 flagged requests at a rate of ~4/day. This residential IP is likely a compromised consumer device. Home routers and IoT equipment with default credentials are prime targets for botnet operators. The diversity of 3 separate attack methods suggests a comprehensive attack toolkit — likely an automated scanner that tests for vulnerabilities across multiple categories. DK currently accounts for 39 blocked IPs in our database, making it a notable source of malicious traffic. At 235/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇩🇰 Top threats from DK

85.203.47.13 (295)85.203.47.213 (255)85.203.47.192 (255)85.203.47.6 (245)85.203.47.48 (235)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS44803

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 User-Agent Analysis Techniques

Analyzing User-Agent strings reveals automated tools masquerading as legitimate browsers. Inconsistencies between claimed browser capabilities and actual behavior, impossible version combinations, and known scanner signatures help identify malicious clients.

💡 Subnet-Level vs IP-Level Blocking

When multiple IPs in a subnet show malicious behavior, subnet blocking efficiently neutralizes the threat. However, overly broad blocking risks impacting legitimate users. Analysis of subnet ownership and historical behavior guides appropriate blocking scope.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: