ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
192.53.123.133

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 11:11:35
First seen: 2026-03-12 03:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-12 03:00:05
195

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 195/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHBURST
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
192.53.123.133
Type
Hosting
Country
🇨🇦 Canada
City
Toronto
ISP
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
Organization
Linode
Autonomous System
AS63949 Akamai Connected Cloud
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 9High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 7 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Σ = 195
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-12 03:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 9 (+100), Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), Burst: 7 req / 2s (+35)
2026-03-12 03:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 195/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Akamai Technologies, Inc.
AS63949 · 🇨🇦 Canada
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 192.53.123.133 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 192.53.123.133 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
openbsd:openssh:8.9p1canonical:ubuntu_linux
Hostnames: prod-meitnerium-ca-ca-central-14.li.binaryedge.ninja
PTR: prod-meitnerium-ca-ca-central-14.li.binaryedge.ninja

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

192.53.123.133 has been assigned a threat score of 195/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 192.53.123.133 originates from Toronto, Canada, operating on the network of Akamai Technologies, Inc.. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. Over a period of 1 days, this IP generated 1 malicious requests, averaging approximately 1 requests per day. This address belongs to a datacenter or cloud hosting provider. Hosting IPs are frequently leveraged by threat actors who rent cheap VPS instances specifically for conducting attacks. The IP is engaged in request flooding, sending traffic at rates designed to exhaust server capacity. At 195/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP belongs to a hosting or data center provider. Malicious traffic from hosting infrastructure often originates from compromised VPS instances, rented servers used for scanning campaigns, or abused free-tier cloud accounts. Hosting providers typically respond to abuse reports within 24-72 hours.

11

Related Threats

🇨🇦 Top threats from Canada

172.105.26.24 (75)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS63949

50.116.47.11 (255)172.238.126.146 (230)45.33.70.9 (230)74.207.234.150 (230)172.236.152.70 (230)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 XML External Entity (XXE) Attacks

XXE vulnerabilities in XML parsers allow attackers to read local files, perform SSRF, and execute denial of service attacks. Many legacy applications and APIs remain vulnerable to XXE due to insecure default XML parser configurations.

💡 Bulletproof Hosting Ecosystem

Bulletproof hosting providers deliberately ignore abuse complaints, creating safe havens for malicious operations. These providers often operate in jurisdictions with weak cybercrime enforcement, offering services specifically marketed to criminal organizations.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: