ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
192.42.116.57

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-09-01 07:11:45
First seen: 2026-07-01 02:13:48
Last seen: 2026-08-30 01:11:19
80

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 80/100. Total malicious requests observed: 752.

BURSTDANGER_PATHREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
192.42.116.57
Type
VPN
Country
🇳🇱 Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
ISP
Church of Cyberology
Organization
TOR Exit and More
Autonomous System
AS215125 Church of Cyberology
Hit Count
752
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Burst 15/10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst 5/2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Foreign refererReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-07-01 02:13:48
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Burst 15/10s (+35), Burst 5/2s (+35), Danger strong hits: 1 (+25)
2026-08-30 01:11:19
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 80/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Church of Cyberology
AS215125 · 🇳🇱 Netherlands
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 192.42.116.57 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 192.42.116.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 192.42.116.57.

07

Neighbors in 192.42.116.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
spam.dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
bl.blocklist.de
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
cbl.abuseat.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl.dronebl.org

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

192.42.116.57 has been assigned a threat score of 80/100 (Critical). This represents a critical risk level. Our detection systems have flagged multiple high-confidence indicators of malicious intent from this address.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 192.42.116.57 to malicious activity originating from Amsterdam, Netherlands, operating on the network of Church of Cyberology. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. During its 59-day observation window, we recorded 752 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 12.7 per day on average. The address operates as a VPN/proxy exit node. Attackers route traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their real location and evade IP-based security controls. Rate-based attacks from this IP aim to overwhelm server resources through high-volume request flooding. Netherlands currently accounts for 105 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. A threat score of 80/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is associated with a VPN or proxy service. Attackers frequently route their traffic through anonymizing services to obscure their true location. This makes attribution more challenging but the malicious behavior patterns remain detectable.

11

Related Threats

🇳🇱 Top threats from Netherlands

91.92.43.144 (358)91.92.43.186 (358)91.92.43.190 (358)91.92.43.157 (358)91.92.43.153 (358)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS215125

192.42.116.61 (83)192.42.116.65 (65)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 DDoS Mitigation Approaches

Distributed denial of service attacks overwhelm infrastructure with traffic volume. Effective mitigation combines always-on traffic scrubbing, anycast network distribution, rate limiting, and the ability to quickly scale absorption capacity during attacks.

💡 Privacy-Preserving Threat Detection

Advanced techniques enable threat detection while minimizing privacy impact. Encrypted DNS, differential privacy in analytics, and federated learning for threat models allow effective security monitoring without unnecessary surveillance of legitimate user behavior.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: