ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
192.3.169.176

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 12:01:47
First seen: 2026-04-21 06:00:06
Last seen: 2026-04-21 08:00:07
225

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 225/100. Total malicious requests observed: 3.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404BURSTREDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
192.3.169.176
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Los Angeles
ISP
HostPapa
Organization
Unknown
Autonomous System
AS36352 HostPapa
Hit Count
3
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 45High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Burst: 26 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 26 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Danger strong hits: 41High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Burst: 48 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Danger strong hits: 5High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+100
Σ = 460
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-21 06:00:06
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 45 (+100), 404 ratio >= 60% (+25), Burst: 26 req / 2s (+35)
2026-04-21 08:00:07
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 225/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

HostPapa
AS36352 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 192.3.169.176 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 192.3.169.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 192.3.169.176: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 192.3.169.176 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

07

Neighbors in 192.3.169.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (4)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22SSHLowSecure Shell — common brute force target for remote access
5242UnknownLowService on port 5242
5243UnknownLowService on port 5243
5351UnknownLowService on port 5351
DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
canonical:ubuntu_linuxopenbsd:openssh:9.6p1
Hostnames: 192-3-169-176-host.colocrossing.com
PTR: 192-3-169-176-host.colocrossing.com

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
⛔ LISTED
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

192.3.169.176 has been assigned a threat score of 225/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path EnumerationRequest Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

192.3.169.176 is registered in Los Angeles, United States, operating on the network of HostPapa. This IP first appeared in our threat feeds after triggering multiple behavioral detection signatures. Our sensors captured 3 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~3 requests per day. The address is classified as residential, meaning it likely belongs to an end-user ISP connection. Malicious activity from residential IPs typically indicates device compromise or botnet membership. The dual attack vectors of Path Enumeration combined with Request Flooding indicate a coordinated assault rather than opportunistic scanning. United States currently accounts for 200 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 225/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS36352

23.94.40.119 (318)172.245.95.40 (280)23.94.28.183 (255)192.227.215.35 (255)172.245.214.62 (245)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Prototype Pollution Attacks

Prototype pollution manipulates JavaScript object prototypes to inject properties that affect all objects in an application. This can lead to denial of service, property injection, and in some cases remote code execution in Node.js applications.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: