ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
185.152.66.232

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-30 11:00:50
First seen: 2026-04-26 16:00:05
Last seen: 2026-04-27 20:00:06
180

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 180/100. Total malicious requests observed: 9.

DANGER_PATHBURSTRATIO_404
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
185.152.66.232
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Atlanta
ISP
Datacamp Limited
Organization
ATL II
Autonomous System
AS60068 Datacamp Limited
Hit Count
9
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger strong hits: 1High-risk paths: shells, RCE vectors, exploits+25
Danger medium hits: 16Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Burst: 16 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 16 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 15 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 14 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
404 ratio >= 60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+25
Σ = 250
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-26 16:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger strong hits: 1 (+25), Danger medium hits: 16 (+60), Burst: 16 req / 2s (+35)
2026-04-27 20:00:06
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 180/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Datacamp Limited
AS60068 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 185.152.66.232 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 185.152.66.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Traffic Flood Defense

IP 185.152.66.232 is generating excessive traffic. Limit connections per source IP. Enable geographic blocking if traffic from this region is unexpected.

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 185.152.66.232: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 185.152.66.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (8)
PortServiceRiskDescription
443HTTPSLowHTTPS web server — encrypted web traffic
1337UnknownLowService on port 1337
6443UnknownLowService on port 6443
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8081UnknownLowService on port 8081
8443HTTPS-AltLowService on port 8443
55207UnknownLowService on port 55207
65518UnknownLowService on port 65518

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
zen.spamhaus.org
⛔ LISTED
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

185.152.66.232 has been assigned a threat score of 180/100 (Critical). With this rating, the IP falls into the critical severity bracket — among the most dangerous addresses in our monitoring database.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request FloodingPath Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

Threat intelligence analysis has linked 185.152.66.232 to malicious activity originating from Atlanta, United States, operating on the network of Datacamp Limited. The address has been under observation since its initial detection. Our sensors captured 9 malicious requests from this address across a 1-day span, reflecting a sustained attack cadence of ~9 requests per day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. Two attack patterns were identified (Request Flooding and Path Enumeration), suggesting a semi-automated campaign that targets multiple vulnerabilities. Our records show 23 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a notable contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 180/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

37.19.206.57 (255)84.17.35.119 (255)37.19.206.59 (255)195.181.163.73 (235)84.17.45.176 (220)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS60068

84.17.39.195 (325)37.19.206.57 (255)143.244.42.85 (255)84.17.35.119 (255)89.187.163.218 (255)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Credential Stuffing at Scale

Credential stuffing uses stolen username-password pairs from data breaches to attempt logins across many websites. Since users frequently reuse passwords, these automated attacks achieve success rates of 0.1-2%, which translates to thousands of compromised accounts from millions of attempts.

💡 Rate Limiting and Throttling Strategies

Effective rate limiting must balance protection against abuse with allowing legitimate traffic bursts. Sliding window algorithms, token buckets, and adaptive thresholds based on client reputation provide layered defense against flooding attacks.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: