ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
178.176.78.240

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-27 06:27:21
First seen: 2026-03-11 04:00:05
Last seen: 2026-03-11 04:00:05
90

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 90/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHBURSTREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
178.176.78.240
Type
Mobile
Country
🇷🇺 Russia
City
Moscow
ISP
PJSC MegaFon
Organization
Pool Megafon AMS
Autonomous System
AS25159 PJSC MegaFon
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 1Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+10
Burst: 9 req / 2sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Burst: 12 req / 10sAbnormally fast request rate — automated scanning+35
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 90
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
[redacted]
GET
/page
200
Requests shown: 2 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-03-11 04:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 1 (+10), Burst: 9 req / 2s (+35), Burst: 12 req / 10s (+35)
2026-03-11 04:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 90/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

PJSC MegaFon
AS25159 · 🇷🇺 Russia
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 178.176.78.240 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🌊 Flood / DDoS Mitigation

Implement limit_req_zone in nginx. Deploy CDN with DDoS protection. Configure SYN cookies and connection tracking to throttle 178.176.78.240.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

178.176.78.240 has been assigned a threat score of 90/100 (Critical). A score this high marks a critical threat actor. This address has demonstrated persistent, aggressive malicious behavior across multiple detection vectors.

The following attack categories were identified:

Request Flooding

📊 Threat Analysis

Network traffic from 178.176.78.240, located in Moscow, Russia, operating on the network of PJSC MegaFon, has been classified as malicious by our automated threat scoring engine. During its 1-day observation window, we recorded 1 hostile requests from this IP — roughly 1 per day on average. This is a mobile network IP. While mobile addresses are typically shared via CGNAT, persistent malicious activity from this specific address suggests automated abuse. Rate-based attacks from this IP aim to overwhelm server resources through high-volume request flooding. Russia currently accounts for 111 blocked IPs in our database, making it a significant source of malicious traffic. At 90/100, this is an extremely high-risk address. All traffic should be considered hostile.

11

Related Threats

🇷🇺 Top threats from Russia

157.22.102.172 (313)178.130.54.159 (288)72.56.191.6 (265)95.182.125.201 (265)91.240.87.225 (263)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS25159

94.25.172.198 (140)31.173.86.253 (80)178.176.74.78 (80)31.173.80.186 (80)94.25.168.167 (80)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Remote Code Execution (RCE)

RCE vulnerabilities allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on target servers. These critical flaws often arise from deserialization bugs, template injection, or file upload vulnerabilities, and represent the highest severity class of web application weaknesses.

💡 HTTP Request Smuggling

Request smuggling exploits differences in how front-end and back-end servers parse HTTP requests. This technique can bypass security controls, poison web caches, and hijack other users sessions by desynchronizing request boundaries.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: