ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
176.126.164.213

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-26 23:36:07
First seen: 2026-02-25 09:00:04
Last seen: 2026-02-25 09:00:04
70

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 70/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
176.126.164.213
Type
Residential
Country
🇰🇬 KG
City
Bishkek
ISP
Hoster kg, Ltd.
Organization
Hoster kg, Ltd.
Autonomous System
AS59684 Hoster kg, Ltd.
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 70
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-02-25 09:00:04
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), Foreign referer seen (+10)
2026-02-25 09:00:04
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 70/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Hoster kg, Ltd.
AS59684 · 🇰🇬 KG
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 176.126.164.213 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

⚙️ General Security

Add 176.126.164.213 to your firewall blocklist. Review logs for successful connections. Enable comprehensive logging on all public-facing services.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (1)
PortServiceRiskDescription
22022UnknownLowService on port 22022
DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
openbsd:openssh:8.2p1canonical:ubuntu_linux
Hostnames: kvm6.hoster.kg
PTR: kvm6.hoster.kg

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

⛔ LISTED
Spamhaus ZEN

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

176.126.164.213 has been assigned a threat score of 70/100 (High). This classifies it as a high-severity threat. Proactive blocking is recommended for sensitive infrastructure.

📊 Threat Analysis

Our monitoring infrastructure has identified 176.126.164.213, geolocated to Bishkek, KG, operating on the network of Hoster kg, Ltd., as a source of suspicious network activity. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. Operating from a residential network, this IP may represent a compromised home gateway or IoT device that has been drafted into a larger attack infrastructure. A threat score of 70/100 places this IP in the high-risk category. Blocking at the firewall level is recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇰🇬 Top threats from KG

146.120.212.169 (103)94.143.198.30 (103)193.34.225.212 (83)158.181.28.9 (70)158.181.16.171 (68)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS59684

View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 API Abuse and Enumeration

Modern attacks increasingly target APIs rather than traditional web interfaces. Attackers enumerate endpoints, test for broken authentication, and exploit excessive data exposure. API attacks are harder to detect as they mimic legitimate programmatic access patterns.

💡 DNS-Based Threat Detection

Monitoring DNS queries reveals malicious activity including command-and-control communication, data exfiltration through DNS tunneling, and connections to known malicious domains. DNS is often the first indicator of compromise in network forensics.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: