ABUSE.MOM
THREAT REPORT

IP Threat Report
173.232.7.166

ABUSE.MOM — BEHAVE OR GET EXPOSED

Generated: 2026-05-22 13:02:58
First seen: 2026-04-19 09:00:05
Last seen: 2026-04-19 09:00:05
105

⛔ Verdict: BLOCK

This IP address has been classified as a source of malicious automated activity. Threat score: 105/100. Total malicious requests observed: 1.

DANGER_PATHRATIO_404REDIRECT_PROBEREFERER
01

Geolocation & Classification

IP Address
173.232.7.166
Type
Residential
Country
🇺🇸 United States
City
Henderson
ISP
Eonix Corporation
Organization
CyberGate Web Solutions
Autonomous System
AS62904 Eonix Corporation
Hit Count
1
02

Detection Signatures

SignatureDescriptionPointsSeverity
Danger medium hits: 6Medium-risk: admin panels, config files+60
404 ratio 40-60%Majority of requests returned 404 — enumeration+15
Probe pattern 302->404 same pathBehavioral anomaly detected by automated analysis+20
Foreign referer seenReferer from unrelated external domain+10
Σ = 105
03

Observed Activity

Reconstructed HTTP requests from server access logs. Target domains redacted for security.

[redacted]
GET
/
200
Requests shown: 1 · HTTP 404: 0 · Dangerous patterns: 0

* Typical request patterns for detected signatures. Actual target domains are redacted.

04

Timeline

2026-04-19 09:00:05
First malicious request detected
IP entered monitoring from server access logs
During observation
Multiple detection signatures triggered
Danger medium hits: 6 (+60), 404 ratio 40-60% (+15), Probe pattern 302->404 same path (+20)
2026-04-19 09:00:05
Last malicious request observed
Total score reached: 105/100
Next cycle
IP blocked — all subsequent requests denied (HTTP 403)
Added to blocklist automatically
05

Network Provider

Eonix Corporation
AS62904 · 🇺🇸 United States
06

Recommendations

Actions taken & recommended

  • IP 173.232.7.166 is blocked at application level (HTTP 403)
  • Consider blocking at firewall level (iptables/CSF) to reduce server load
  • Other malicious IPs detected in the same /24 subnet — consider blocking 173.232.7.0/24
  • Report abuse to the network provider via their abuse contact
  • Ensure sensitive files (.env, .git, backups) are not accessible from the web

🔎 Path Enumeration Protection

Block scanning from 173.232.7.166: rate-limit 404 responses per IP, deploy a honeypot 404 page, ensure no backup files are web-accessible.

07

Neighbors in 173.232.7.0/24

Other blocked IPs from the same /24 subnet — indicates systematic abuse from this network range.

08

Open Ports & Services

Network reconnaissance data from Shodan. Open ports may indicate running services, misconfigurations, or potential attack surfaces.

OPEN PORTS (4)
PortServiceRiskDescription
80HTTPLowHTTP web server — standard web traffic
8000UnknownLowService on port 8000
8080HTTP-AltLowHTTP alternative port — often used for admin panels or proxies
8800UnknownLowService on port 8800
KNOWN VULNERABILITIES (CVE) (59)
CVE IDLink
CVE-2019-12521NVD →
CVE-2023-49285NVD →
CVE-2021-28116NVD →
CVE-2020-8517NVD →
CVE-2026-32748NVD →
CVE-2021-33620NVD →
CVE-2019-18679NVD →
CVE-2019-12519NVD →
CVE-2026-33526NVD →
CVE-2025-59362NVD →
CVE-2019-18860NVD →
CVE-2021-46784NVD →
CVE-2019-12523NVD →
CVE-2020-14058NVD →
CVE-2019-12526NVD →
CVE-2019-18678NVD →
CVE-2021-28652NVD →
CVE-2016-10002NVD →
CVE-2018-19131NVD →
CVE-2016-2390NVD →
CVE-2016-3947NVD →
CVE-2018-19132NVD →
CVE-2022-41318NVD →
CVE-2020-15049NVD →
CVE-2021-31808NVD →
+34 more

🔴 This host has 59 known CVEs associated with its exposed services. This volume strongly suggests severely outdated software. Review each CVE in the NVD database.

DETECTED TECHNOLOGIES
squid-cache:squid:3.1.23
Hostnames: 173-232-7-166-serverhub.com
PTR: 173-232-7-166-serverhub.com

Data source: Shodan InternetDB. Scanned independently of abuse.mom.

09

Blacklist Status (DNSBL)

This IP was checked against major DNS-based blacklists used by mail servers and firewalls worldwide.

✓ Clean
dnsbl.sorbs.net
✓ Clean
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net
✓ Clean
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net
✓ Clean
bl.spamcop.net
✓ Clean
zen.spamhaus.org
✓ Clean
b.barracudacentral.org
✓ Clean
truncate.gbudb.net
✓ Clean
psbl.surriel.com

Checked: Spamhaus, SpamCop, Barracuda, SORBS, CBL, UCEProtect. Results may change over time.

10

Threat Analysis

173.232.7.166 has been assigned a threat score of 105/100 (Critical). This places it in the critical threat category. Immediate blocking is strongly advised across all network perimeters.

The following attack categories were identified:

Path Enumeration

📊 Threat Analysis

The address 173.232.7.166 originates from Henderson, United States, operating on the network of Eonix Corporation. It was identified through automated analysis of incoming network traffic across monitored endpoints. The address has been active for 1 days in our monitoring system, producing 1 flagged requests at a rate of ~1/day. This is a residential IP address, suggesting a compromised home device such as a router, smart appliance, or infected workstation participating in a botnet. The IP exhibits directory enumeration behavior, systematically requesting non-existent paths to discover hidden files and misconfigured resources. Our records show 133 malicious IPs originating from United States, positioning it as a significant contributor to global threat activity. With a threat score of 105/100, this IP is among the most dangerous addresses in our database. Immediate and complete blocking is strongly recommended.

This IP is classified as residential, suggesting it may belong to a compromised home device, IoT botnet member, or an infected personal computer. Residential IPs involved in attacks often indicate malware infection without the owner's knowledge.

11

Related Threats

🇺🇸 Top threats from United States

104.28.246.115 (350)104.28.246.113 (340)104.28.246.116 (340)104.28.235.58 (340)104.28.246.122 (340)View all →

🏢 Same network: AS62904

170.130.163.233 (165)170.130.163.94 (165)107.158.200.191 (105)104.206.162.86 (105)107.158.200.144 (105)View all →
12

Security Intelligence

💡 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

SSRF attacks trick servers into making requests to internal resources that should not be publicly accessible. This can expose cloud metadata endpoints, internal APIs, and private network services, potentially leading to full infrastructure compromise.

💡 Behavioral Analysis vs Signature Detection

Signature-based detection matches known attack patterns but misses novel threats. Behavioral analysis identifies anomalies in request patterns, timing, and volume, catching zero-day attacks that signatures cannot recognize.

🔍 Check Any IP Address

Share this report: